In our league, there is no relationship between time dedication and sucess. This seems to directly contrast the majority opinion that Fantasy Football is a "game of skill".
Our league showed no significant connection to historical win rates (Pearson Correlation of -0.19). The next step is to determine how shared knowledge plays a role in all of this.
From the chart above, one can see a positive correlation between a combined team FPPG and their similarity with Draft Reference Rankings (Spearman correlation of 0.66). With a p-value less than 0.02, this data would reject my null and indeed support my belief that shared knowledge greatly reduces relative skill in Fantasy Football
Note: The conclusion is consistent when comparing only starters and also when considering Total Fantasy Points instead of FFPG.
In this case, there was a significant difference, but it was the opposite of popular opinion. Shared knowledge proved better than any 'skillful' alternative
Sample size was too small.
Our draft was held a month before the rankings were posted.
Our league has slightly different rules and point calculations than the rankings assume. For more on this, see my work on Defensive Schemes
It would be nice to build a website similar to this one that allows people to analyze their league's draft data while also feeding a database.
Admittedly, I lied with the data. All the numbers and labels are accurate, but the conclusion is misleading. Can you figure out what it is? Feel free to contact me if you would like to know more about this research topic and what I have done beyond what you see above.